Moderate knowledge is not enough – a longitudinal study on knowledge and acceptance of evolution among pre-service science teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11576/zdb-7357Keywords:
evolution education, knowledge of evolution, longitudinal studyAbstract
Understanding evolution is crucial for comprehending biology and addressing contemporary biological crises. To teach evolution effectively, science teachers need profound content knowledge of evolution and a high acceptance of evolution. On average, across Europe, science teachers’ knowledge of evolution is only low to moderate, while their acceptance levels vary. Switzerland has recently integrated fundamental concepts of evolution into school curricula, from early childhood education to secondary school. However, there is limited information on pre-service science teachers’ knowledge and acceptance of evolution and the effectiveness of biology courses within teacher education programs in Switzerland. In a longitudinal (n = 32) and cross-sectional (n = 658) study spanning 3 years, the knowledge and acceptance of evolution among pre-service science and non-science teachers in Switzerland were surveyed using two established questionnaires (KAEVO 2.0 and ATEVO). The knowledge of evolution observed in pre-service science teachers increased throughout their studies. However, even upon completion of their studies, knowledge remained at a moderate level. The students still held persistent alternative conceptions, e.g. regarding the heredity of phenotype changes, variation, and fitness. The comparison group, without biology courses, exhibited low levels of knowledge at all measurement points. Both groups, however, demonstrated high levels of acceptance. The Model of Educational Reconstruction is discussed as an approach for teacher education to improve the effectiveness of teaching evolution, along with a stronger focus on professional orientation. Specifically, imparting school-relevant knowledge, considering students’ alternative conceptions, and the repeated application of core concepts could contribute to increasing student learning outcomes.
References
Abell, S. K. (2013). Research on Science Teacher Knowledge. In Abell, S. K. & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 1105–1149). New York: Routledge.
Akyol, G., Tekkaya, C. & Sungur, S. (2010). The contribution of understandings of evolutionary theory and nature of science to pre-service science teachers’ acceptance of evolutionary theory. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1889–1893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.419
Akyol, G., Tekkaya, C., Sungur, S. & Traynor, A. (2012). Modeling the Interrelationships Among Pre-service Science Teachers’ Understanding and Acceptance of Evolution, Their Views on Nature of Science and Self-Efficacy Beliefs Regarding Teaching Evolution. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(8), 937–957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9296-x
Aptyka, H., Fiedler, D. & Großschedl, J. (2022). Effects of situated learning and clarification of misconceptions on contextual reasoning about natural selection. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 15(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-022-00163-5
Arthur, S. (2013). Evolution acceptance among pre-service primary teachers. Evolution: Education and Out-reach, 6(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/1936-6434-6-20
Athanasiou, K. (2022). Teaching Evolution as the Unifying Theory of Biology via a University Course: Re-Count of a Praxis. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(4), e2275. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11976
Athanasiou, K., Katakos, E. & Papadopoulou, P. (2012). Conceptual ecology of evolution acceptance among Greek education students: the contribution of knowledge increase. Journal of Biological Education, 46(4), 234–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2012.716780
Athanasiou, K. & Mavrikaki, E. (2014). Conceptual Inventory of Natural Selection as a Tool for Measuring Greek University Students’ Evolution Knowledge: Differences between novice and advanced students. International Journal of Science Education, 36(8), 1262–1285. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.856529
Athanasiou, K. & Papadopoulou, P. (2012). Conceptual Ecology of the Evolution Acceptance among Greek Education Students: Knowledge, religious practices and social influences. International Journal of Sci-ence Education, 34(6), 903–924. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.586072
Audette, L. M., Hammond, M. S. & Rochester, N. K. (2020). Methodological Issues with Coding Participants in Anonymous Psychological Longitudinal Studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 80(1), 163–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164419843576
Aufschnaiter, C. von & Rogge, C. (2010). Misconceptions or missing conceptions? EURASIA Journal of Mathe-matics, Science and Technology Education, 6(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75223
Autor:innengruppe Bildungsberichterstattung (2022). Bildung in Deutschland 2022. Bielefeld: wbv Publikation.
Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A. et al. (2010). Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge, Cognitive Activation in the Classroom, and Student Progress. American Educational Re-search Journal, 47(1), 133–180. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157
Becker, M. & Schmiedek, F. (2022). Längsschnitt in der Schulforschung. In T. Hascher, T.-S. Idel & W. Helsper (Eds.), Handbuch Schulforschung (pp. 195–217). Wiesbaden: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24729-4_8
Beniermann, A. (2019). Evolution – von Akzeptanz und Zweifeln: Empirische Studien über Einstellungen zu Evolution und Bewusstsein. Wiesbaden: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24105-6
Beniermann, A., Kuschmierz, P., Pinxten, R., Aivelo, T., Bajrami, A., Bohlin, G. et al. (2021). Evolution Educa-tion Questionnaire on Acceptance and Knowledge (EEQ) - Standardised and ready-to-use protocols to measure acceptance of evolution and knowledge about evolution in an international context. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.7779165
Beniermann, A., Moormann, A. & Fiedler, D. (2023). Validity aspects in measuring evolution acceptance: Evi-dence from surveys of preservice biology teachers and creationists. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(6), 1223–1265. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21830
Chen, C., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M. & Sunbury, S. (2020). The Impact of High School Life Science Teachers’ Subject Matter Knowledge and Knowledge of Student Misconceptions on Students’ Learning. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-08-0164
CIIP - Conférence intercantonale de l’instruction publique de la Suisse romande et du Tessin [Intercantonal Conference of Education of French-speaking Switzerland and Ticino] (2010). Plan d’études romand [Swiss curriculum for the French-speaking regions].
DECS - Dipartimento dell’educazione, della cultura e dello sport [Department of Education, Culture and Sport] (2015). Piano di studio della scuola obbligatoria ticinese [Curriculum of the compulsory school in Ti-cino].
D-EDK - Deutschschweizer Erziehungsdirektoren-Konferenz [Conference of Education Directors of German-speaking Switzerland] (2015). Lehrplan 21 [Curriculum 21].
Deniz, H., Çetin, F. & Yilmaz, I. (2011). Examining the relationships among acceptance of evolution, religiosity, and teaching preference for evolution in Turkish preservice biology teachers. Reports of the National Center for Science Education, 31(4), 1–9.
Deniz, H. & Sahin, E. A. (2016). Exploring the factors related to acceptance of evolutionary theory among Turk-ish preservice biology teachers and the relationship between acceptance and teaching preference. Elec-tronic Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 21–43.
Duit, R., Gropengießer, H., Kattmann, U., Komorek, M. & Parchmann, I. (2012). The Model of Educational Reconstruction – a Framework for Improving Teaching and Learning Science. In D. Jorde & J. Dillon (Eds.), Science Education Research and Practice in Europe (S. 13–37). Rotterdam: SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-900-8_2
Duit, R. & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305016
European Commission (n. d.). European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS). Retrieved May 24, 2024 from https://education.ec.europa.eu/education-levels/higher-education/inclusive-and-connected-higher-education/european-credit-transfer-and-accumulation-system#
Fiedler, D., Moormann, A. & Beniermann, A. (2024). Using different acceptance measures: The interplay of evolution acceptance, evolution understanding, and religious belief among German preservice biology teachers, secondary school students, and creationists. Science Education, 108(1), 223–274. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21833
Fiedler, D., Tröbst, S. & Harms, U. (2017). University students’ conceptual knowledge of randomness and prob-ability in the contexts of evolution and mathematics. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-07-0230
Fischer, J., Jansen, T., Möller, J. & Harms, U. (2021). Measuring biology trainee teachers’ professional knowledge about evolution—introducing the Student Inventory. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-021-00144-0
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H. et al. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Gess‐Newsome, J. & Lederman, N. G. (1993). Preservice biology teachers’ knowledge structures as a function of professional teacher education: A year‐long assessment. Science Education, 77(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730770103
Gess‐Newsome, J. & Lederman, N. G. (1995). Biology teachers’ perceptions of subject matter structure and its relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(3), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320309
Gess-Newsome, J., Southerland, S. A., Johnston, A. & Woodbury, S. (2003). Educational Reform, Personal Prac-tical Theories, and Dissatisfaction: The Anatomy of Change in College Science Teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 731–767. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040003731
Graf, D. & Hamdorf, E. (2011). Evolution Verbreitete Fehlvorstellungen zu einem zentralen Thema. In D.C. Dreesmann, D. Graf & K. Witte (Eds.), Evolutionsbiologie (pp. 25–41). Heidelberg: Spektrum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8274-2786-1_1
Graf, D. & Soran, H. (2010). Einstellung und Wissen von Lehramtsstudierenden zur Evolution – ein Vergleich zwischen Deutschland und der Türkei. In D. Graf (Eds.), Evolutionstheorie - Akzeptanz und Vermitt-lung im europäischen Vergleich (pp. 141–161). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02228-9_10
Gregory, T. R. (2009). Understanding Natural Selection: Essential Concepts and Common Misconceptions. Evo-lution: Education and Outreach, 2(2), 156–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-009-0128-1
Großschedl, J., Konnemann, C. & Basel, N. (2014). Pre-service biology teachers’ acceptance of evolutionary theory and their preference for its teaching. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 7(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-014-0018-z
Großschedl, J., Seredszus, F. & Harms, U. (2018). Angehende Biologielehrkräfte: evolutionsbezogenes Wissen und Akzeptanz der Evolutionstheorie. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 24(1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40573-018-0072-0
Ha, M., Baldwin, B. C. & Nehm, R. H. (2015). The Long-Term Impacts of Short-Term Professional Develop-ment: Science Teachers and Evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 8(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-015-0040-9
Hammann, M. (2019). Organisationsebenen biologischer Systeme unterscheiden und vernetzen: Empirische Befunde und Empfehlungen für die Praxis. In J. Groß, M. Hammann, P. Schmiemann & J. Zabel (Eds.), Biologiedidaktische Forschung: Erträge für die Praxis (pp. 77–91). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58443-9_5
Hanisch, S. & Eirdosh, D. (2023). Developing Teacher Competencies for Teaching Evolution across the Primary School Curriculum: A Design Study of a Pre-Service Teacher Education Module. Education Sciences, 13(8), 797. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13080797
Harms, U. & Reiss, M. J. (2019). Evolution Education Re-considered: Understanding What Works. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14698-6
Hartelt, T., Martens, H. & Minkley, N. (2022). Teachers’ ability to diagnose and deal with alternative student conceptions of evolution. Science Education, 106(3), 706–738. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21705
Heimann, P., Otto, G. & Schulz, W. (1965). Unterricht: Analyse und Planung. Hannover: Schroedel.
Hill, H. C., Rowan, B. & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching on Stu-dent Achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042002371
Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Sci-ence Education, 25(6), 645–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305021
Idsardi, R. C., Luft, J. A., Wingfield, J. L., Whitt, B., Barriga, P. A. & Lang, J. D. (2023). Relationships between undergraduate instructors’ conceptions of how students learn and their instructional practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(9), 2076–2110. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21853
Irez, S. & Bakanay, Ç. D. Ö. (2011). An assessment into pre-service biology teachers’ approaches to the theory of evolution and nature of science. Egitim ve Bilim, 36(162), 39–55.
John, T. & Starauschek, E. (2021). Ein Modell für kumulatives Lehren im Lehramtsstudium Physik. Physik und Didaktik in Schule und Hochschule PhyDid 1/19, 23–42.
Kampourakis, K. (2022). Reconsidering the goals of evolution education: defining evolution and evolutionary literacy. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 15(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-022-00180-4
Kattmann, U., Duit, R., Gropengießer, H. & Komorek, M. (1997). Das Modell der Didaktischen Rekonstruktion - Ein Rahmen für naturwissenschaftsdidaktische Forschung und Entwicklung. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 3(3), 3–18.
Klafki, W. (1958). Didaktische Analyse als Kern der Unterrichtsvorbereitung. Die Deutsche Schule, 50(10), 450–471.
Komorek, M., Fischer, A. & Moschner, B. (2013). Fachdidaktische Strukturierung als Grundlage für Unterrichts-designs. In M. Komorek & S. Prediger (Eds.), Der lange Weg zum Unterrichtsdesign. Zur Begründung und Umsetzung fachdidaktischer Forschungs- und Entwicklungsprogramme (pp. 37–57). Münster: Waxmann.
Kuschmierz, P., Beniermann, A. & Graf, D. (2020a). Development and evaluation of the knowledge about evo-lution 2.0 instrument (KAEVO 2.0). International Journal of Science Education, 42(15), 2601–2629. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1822561
Kuschmierz, P., Meneganzin, A., Pinxten, R., Pievani, T., Cvetković, D., Mavrikaki, E. et al. (2020b). Towards common ground in measuring acceptance of evolution and knowledge about evolution across Europe: a systematic review of the state of research. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 13(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-020-00132-w
Lagler, E. & Wilhelm, M. (2013). Zusammenhang von Schülerleistung und Fachausbildung der Lehrkräfte in den Naturwissenschaften – eine Pilotstudie zur Situation in der Schweiz. Chimica et etc. didactica, 38(105), 47–70.
Lanka, J., Hild, P. & Beniermann, A. (2024). Fit to Teach Evolution? Pre- and In-service Teachers’ Knowledge and Acceptance of Evolution. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2416594
Lanka, J., Hild, P., Milani, D. & Letouzey-Pasquier, J. (2023). Evolution in Schweizer Lehrplänen. Progress in Science Education (PriSE), 6(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.25321/PRISE.2023.1378
Nadelson, L. S. & Southerland, S. (2012). A More Fine-Grained Measure of Students’ Acceptance of Evolution: Development of the Inventory of Student Evolution Acceptance—I-SEA. International Journal of Science Education, 34(11), 1637–1666. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.702235
Nehm, R. H., Großschedl, J., Harms, U. & Roshayanti, F. (2013). American, German, Korean, and Indonesian pre-service teachers’ evolutionary acceptance, knowledge, and reasoning patterns. The Proceedings of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST) conference.
Nehm, R. H. & Reilly, L. (2007). Biology Majors’ Knowledge and Misconceptions of Natural Selection. BioSci-ence, 57(3), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1641/B570311
Nehm, R. H. & Schonfeld, I. S. (2007). Does Increasing Biology Teacher Knowledge of Evolution and the Na-ture of Science Lead to Greater Preference for the Teaching of Evolution in Schools? Journal of Sci-ence Teacher Education, 18(5), 699–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-007-9062-7
Opfer, J. E., Nehm, R. H. & Ha, M. (2012). Cognitive foundations for science assessment design: Knowing what students know about evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(6), 744–777. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21028
Riemeier, T. (2007). Moderater Konstruktivismus. In D. Krüger & H. Vogt (Eds.), Theorien in der biologiedidak-tischen Forschung (pp. 69–79). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68166-3_7
Riese, J., Kulgemeyer, C., Zander, S., Borowski, A., Fischer, H. E., Gramzow, Y. et al. (2015). Modellierung und Messung des Professionswissens in der Lehramtsausbildung Physik. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, Beiheft 61. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:15513
Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Coyle, H. P., Cook-Smith, N. & Miller, J. L. (2013). The Influence of Teachers’ Knowledge on Student Learning in Middle School Physical Science Classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1020–1049. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213477680
Schramm, T. & Schmiemann, P. (2019). Teleological pitfalls in reading evolutionary trees and ways to avoid them. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-019-0112-3
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175860
Sickel, A. J. & Friedrichsen, P. (2013). Examining the evolution education literature with a focus on teachers: major findings, goals for teacher preparation, and directions for future research. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 6(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1936-6434-6-23
SKBF [Swiss Coordination Centre for Research in Education] (2023). Bildungsbericht Schweiz 2023 [Education Report Switzerland 2023]. Aarau: Schweizerische Koordinationsstelle für Bildungsforschung. Retrieved May 24, 2024 from https://www.skbf-csre.ch/fileadmin/files/pdf/bildungsberichte/2023/BiBer_2023_ D.pdf
Smith, M. U., Snyder, S. W. & Devereaux, R. S. (2016). The GAENE—Generalized Acceptance of EvolutioN Evaluation: Development of a new measure of evolution acceptance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(9), 1289–1315. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21328
Šorgo, A., Usak, M., Kubiatko, M., Fančovičova, J., Prokop, P., Puhek, M., & Skoda, J. (2014). A cross-cultural study on freshmen’s knowledge of genetics, evolution, and the nature of science. Journal of Baltic Sci-ence Education, 13(1), 6-18.
Southerland, S. & Nadelson, L. S. (2012). An Intentional Approach to Teaching Evolution: Making Students Aware of the Factors Influencing Learning of Microevolution and Macroevolution. In K.S. Rosengren et al. (Eds.), Evolution Challenges: Integrating Research and Practice in Teaching and Learning about Evolution (pp. 348–372). New York: Oxford University Press.
Tardent, J. (2020). Unterrichtsplanungen von angehenden Lehrpersonen. Eine videografiegestützte Analyse von Unterrichtsplanungen (Doctoral dissertation). Heidelberg University of Education, Germany.
Tekkaya C, Sungur S & Akyol, G. (2011). Turkish preservice science teachers’ understanding of natural selec-tion: some preliminary findings. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences (WAJES), 485–490.
Tibell, L. A. E. & Harms, U. (2017). Biological Principles and Threshold Concepts for Understanding Natural Selection: Implications for Developing Visualizations as a Pedagogic Tool. Science & Education, 26(7–9), 953–973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9935-x
Torkar, G. & Šorgo, A. (2020). Evolutionary Content Knowledge, Religiosity and Educational Background of Slovene Preschool and Primary School Pre-Service Teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(7), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/7991
Van Dijk, E. M. & Kattmann, U. (2007). A research model for the study of science teachers’ PCK and improving teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 885–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.002
Wilhelm, M. & Kalcsics, K. (Eds.). (2017). Lernwelten. 3. Zyklus, Weiterbildung Praxisbuch. Bern: Schulverlag plus.
Yates, T. B. (2011). Student acquisition of biological evolution-related misconceptions: The role of public high schools introductory biology teachers (Doctoral dissertation). University of Oklahoma.
Yates, T. B. & Marek, E. A. (2014). Teachers teaching misconceptions: a study of factors contributing to high school biology students’ acquisition of biological evolution-related misconceptions. Evolution: Educa-tion and Outreach, 7(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-014-0007-2
Yüce Z. & Önel A. (2015). Fen Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilimin Doğasını Anlamaları Ve Evrim Teorisini Kabul Düzeylerinin Belirlenm [The comprehension of nature of science by science teacher candidates and the determination of their acceptance levels of evolutionary theory]. Electronic Turkish Studies 10(15), 857–872.
Zabel, J. & Gropengießer, H. (2011). Learning progress in evolution theory: climbing a ladder or roaming a land-scape? Journal of Biological Education, 45(3), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2011.586714
Ziadie, M. A. & Andrews, T. C. (2018). Moving Evolution Education Forward: A Systematic Analysis of Litera-ture to Identify Gaps in Collective Knowledge for Teaching. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(1), ar11. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-08-0190
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Judith Lanka, Pitt Hild, Anna Beniermann
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The contributions published on our site are available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0 de). This license applies only to the original material. All marked third-party content (e.g. illustrations, photos, tables, quotations, etc.) is excluded from the CC license. For their reuse, it may be necessary to obtain further usage permissions from the respective rights holder. URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
